That’s strange because even in his James Bond movies I think blond, not Bond.

Whether autism is genetic is not related to the question at all.

How do you know? It can be both.

Do we know if autism is genetic? Otherwise the question is not entirely wrong. There could be a cultural influence that we should figure out.

I said

Both are possible. How should the choice be made which one to use?

I think that clearly is not an argument for middle ground.

Isn’t the point that those things are common decency and explicitly not yet Socialism?

No. However many things are regulated.

Then don’t allow them to use those services without a license. It’s cars or chemicals all over again.

You ignore your own power. It’s two tigers who have to cooperate to escape a burning cage.

Our species is not that selfish. The selfishness is what is induced to make people “healthy”.

I am asking about healthy people. What do they want?

I was wondering when he drove out the Romans. This reply must be meant for another comment.

after kicking the Romans out of their land

citation needed

What is the Nicolaitan way? Wikipedia is quite short on it.

If you share how you improve, others could join. That could grow until everybody is healed.

Question is, what do healthy people want? Do they want to live in peace or do they prefer to fight and to risk everything?

1. There are two kind of Muslims. We are only killing the bad ones. /s

2. genocide … just like how China is killing, reeducating, and forcing them to work?

Do you have numbers for the killings? Otherwise it almost becomes a pro China argument

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China

I am not arguing for a middle ground but for choosing one side and fully committing to it.

Only that I argue that we should choose one side or the other entirely.

If you don’t tolerate someone else in society then you are no longer tolerated.

You can only do that if you control society. If you don’t then intolerance towards nonnormative behavior becomes also a possible strategy.

except the people insisting on making it into a fucking issue

Which are enough that society is split and there is no unity to prevent the planet from burning.

It’s one way to call them stupid and wait until they change their mind. I think it’s better to recognize that they insist on their way with the same determination. So instead of waiting forever, we should find a way to overcome the split.

This can be turned around. The planet is burning and you want to fuck around and argue pronouns.

How should unity be created? By tolerating everything or by surpressing everything in public?

Both are possible. How should the choice be made which one to use?

The US was isolationist prior to WWII

South America wants to have a word with you.