shit hare if you regret
He’s clearly better than everyone who “has online”
OP: roll for perception
Half this thread (rolls 1): What’s this Boomer shit??
ate the gardenhose
has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
What a fucking gibberish.
He did explain the reason. Garden hose.
What? Bad chemicals no hurt, him brain fine 🤪
Shit
What the fuck is a conker? Wrong answers only.
Not cool posting this. He’s obviously having a bad fur day.
Fur yourself.
nah, he’s live and reloaded
That flower with melons though
It’s what you played when you didn’t have “online”. Sure make your hands sore though.
I had online when we were playing Conkers. But that’s because my parents were rad 😎
Yeah, drinking from the garden hose, with phthalates, polyvinyl chloride, bisphenol A, lead, cadmium, etc turned out to not be such a good idea. Childhood memories, when they were good, sure. And don’t poison yourself, or your kids, or your garden especially if you intend to eat from it. But really never, because you won’t survive forever, and others will have to clean up the mess.
https://toxicfreefuture.org/blog/new-study-finds-hazardous-chemicals-in-garden-hoses/
https://ercweb.com/tips/show/read-this-before-you-drink-from-that-garden-hose
Sounds like you’ve never fought your teacher outside.
Nor have I drunk Pepsi!?! from a garden hose. What is this gibberish?
lmao this guy couldn’t afford a pepsi hose
You haven’t truly lived until you’ve had garden hose Pepsi, my dude.
Spoken like someone who never played conkers.
Ok boomer. I also drank from a hose, but it’s not my identity. Go wither away in an old folks home, you republican-voting fuck.
You didn’t actually read the post
Nobody did, because it’s unintelligible
I did. That’s why I insulted the person who created the meme.
Fun fact: hand sanitizer still doesn’t work. There are many strains of nasty bugs that survive even high alcohol concentrations, let alone chemicals like benzalkonium chloride. There’s a reason they have to put, “kills 99.x%”
Antibacterial soaps are banned in Europe because all they do is give germs the evolutionary pressure to get even better at surviving these chemicals.
It has some to do with evolutionary pressure but more to do with water, surfactants and friction in the right application works very very well for antimicrobial purposes and the addition of antibacterial chemicals is potentially harmful to you without benefit(this is why both Europe and the US largely banned triclosan soap). There’s nothing we’d really lose by encouraging resistance to things like alcohol sanitizer which works for most things, though. That works in a different way. The metabolic demands to resist that would include things like spore forming. That doesn’t just appear in a plasmid with some selective pressure like antimicrobial resistance.
Regardless of the marketing term “anti-bacterial” on the label, there are quite a few specific ingredients in this area that are banned in the EU but in wide use in the US.
I’m truly inspired by your ability to back pedal every time you’re called out on your bs. You’ve inspired me to never admit I might be wrong, despite the evidence to the contrary
This is the only comment I’ve made on this post, and it doesn’t backpedal? How is your reading comprehension so low?
Ah, my favorite genre of post
Regardless of the term “anti-bacterial” on the label, there are quite a few specific ingredients in this area that are banned in the EU but in wide use in the US. Two of your links are to products in the UK also, which has totally different regulations from the rest of Europe
Regardless of the marketing term “anti-bacterial” on the label, there are quite a few specific ingredients in this area that are banned in the EU but in wide use in the US.
“Antibacterial” soaps aren’t strictly banned in Europe, but many of the ingredients used in antibacterial soaps in the US are. Sorry these dense mfs giving you grief
